hour rule

Kinja'd!!! "pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69)
02/12/2018 at 03:14 • Filed to: hour rule, Mazda

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 7
Kinja'd!!!

Mazda Ibuki


DISCUSSION (7)


Kinja'd!!! AestheticsInMotion > pip bip - choose Corrour
02/12/2018 at 03:53

Kinja'd!!!1

Frameless Windshield (top) would be incredible. No more ducking my head or straining to see over the top...


Kinja'd!!! Rustholes-Are-Weight-Reduction > pip bip - choose Corrour
02/12/2018 at 03:56

Kinja'd!!!1

I prefer that rear to what the NC eventually became

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Nauraushaun > AestheticsInMotion
02/12/2018 at 04:09

Kinja'd!!!0

I agree. One of those concept things I don’t get why they can’t do. Spyker did it so it’s feasible. Is it really so expensive that nobody else can pull it off?


Kinja'd!!!   > Nauraushaun
02/12/2018 at 06:39

Kinja'd!!!0

I think getting it to actually function properly as an attachment point is the problem rather than the cost.

The frameless Spyker doesn’t have a built in soft top so it’s basically a permanent convertible. You can find images of a removable top which looks absolutely flimsy and ridiculous and I doubt would ever get used by any owner.

Kinja'd!!!

It’s not a problem for low volume weekend cars but imagine this being your only roof option on a standard production car like the Miata — it would never sell.

Spykers with folding soft tops don’t have frameless glass.

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! daender > pip bip - choose Corrour
02/12/2018 at 06:42

Kinja'd!!!1

Wow, it’s about the same size as a NA too!

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Eric @ opposite-lock.com > pip bip - choose Corrour
02/12/2018 at 07:55

Kinja'd!!!0

Likely couldn’t pass crash safety tests...

Still, I like it.


Kinja'd!!! Nauraushaun >  
02/12/2018 at 16:15

Kinja'd!!!0

That’s a very good point. I do suspect they could make it work - some firm clasps on the pillars and a nice rubber seal in between. But perhaps not.